| Title |
The effect of mobile applications for improving adherence in cardiac rehabilitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12872-019-1149-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Linqi Xu, Feng Li, Changli Zhou, Jinwei Li, Chengcheng Hong, Qian Tong |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 209 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 29 | 14% |
| Researcher | 24 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 33 | 16% |
| Unknown | 72 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 44 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 19% |
| Psychology | 9 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 3% |
| Engineering | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 22 | 11% |
| Unknown | 82 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2022.
All research outputs
#7,418,854
of 22,684,168 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
#419
of 1,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,260
of 345,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
#9
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,684,168 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,590 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,176 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.