↓ Skip to main content

Parietal neglect and visual awareness

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Neuroscience, May 1998
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
389 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
411 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Parietal neglect and visual awareness
Published in
Nature Neuroscience, May 1998
DOI 10.1038/217
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jon Driver, Jason B. Mattingley

Abstract

The last decade has seen a resurgence of interest in the neural correlates of conscious vision, with most discussion focused on the 'blindsight' that can follow damage to primary visual cortex, in the occipital lobe. We suggest that new insights into the neural basis of visual awareness may be gleaned from a different neuropsychological phenomenon, namely visual 'neglect' after injury to regions in the parietal lobe. Neglect provides several revealing contrasts with occipital blindsight. Here we summarise four key findings. First, unlike the deficits caused by damage to primary visual cortex, the loss of awareness in parietal neglect is characteristically not strictly retinotopic. Second, visual segmentation processes are preserved in neglect, and can influence what will reach the patient's awareness. Third, extensive unconscious processing takes place for those stimuli on the neglected side which escape awareness, including some degree of object identification. Finally, parietal damage affects initial stages of motor planning as well as perception. These findings are consistent with recent data on single-cell activity in the monkey brain. They also suggest why areas in the inferior parietal lobe may play a prominent role in visual awareness.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 411 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 8 2%
United States 6 1%
Italy 6 1%
Germany 5 1%
Netherlands 3 <1%
Belgium 3 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Other 7 2%
Unknown 368 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 85 21%
Researcher 84 20%
Student > Master 38 9%
Student > Bachelor 34 8%
Professor 31 8%
Other 91 22%
Unknown 48 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 184 45%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 49 12%
Neuroscience 48 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 35 9%
Engineering 6 1%
Other 21 5%
Unknown 68 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2023.
All research outputs
#7,229,030
of 23,571,271 outputs
Outputs from Nature Neuroscience
#3,869
of 5,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,172
of 34,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Neuroscience
#8
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,571,271 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,325 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 54.3. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 34,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.