| Title |
Treating Staphylococcus aureus infections in an intensive care unit at a University Hospital in Brazil
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, March 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11096-016-0273-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marina Gimenes, Tânia Pereira Salci, Maria Cristina B. Tognim, Vera Lúcia Dias Siqueira, Silvana Martins Caparroz-Assef |
| Abstract |
Background Optimizing antimicrobial therapy is important for treating patients who are critically ill with Staphylococcus aureus infection, and susceptibility tests are necessary. Objective The aim of the present study was to evaluate antibacterial therapy after susceptibility testing of S. aureus infections. Setting The setting was an intensive care unit at a University Hospital in Brazil. Methods An observational and retrospective study was conducted over 6 years. The antimicrobials that were used for S. aureus infection treatment were calculated as the defined daily dose per 1000 patient-days (DDD1000). Antimicrobial susceptibility data were obtained by reviewing bacteriological tests. Patient profiles and treatment were determined by analyzing patient charts. Results Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) was prevalent in this study (76.13 %). Patients who were infected with MRSA had total antimicrobial consumption that was three-times higher (9567.2 DDD1000) than patients who were infected with methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA; 3101.1 DDD1000). The average length of stay in the intensive care unit was 19 days (interquartile range 17 days) for MSSA and 20 days (interquartile range 20 days) for MRSA. Mortality in patients who were infected with MSSA was higher (52.17 %) than in patients who were infected with MRSA (33.80 %), and de-escalation was not identified in 73.90 % of MSSA patients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Unknown | 8 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 4% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 12 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2016.
All research outputs
#20,317,110
of 22,858,915 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
#1,014
of 1,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#253,616
of 300,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
#21
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,858,915 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,083 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,256 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.