↓ Skip to main content

A branch-and-cut procedure for the Udine Course Timetabling problem

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Operations Research, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
A branch-and-cut procedure for the Udine Course Timetabling problem
Published in
Annals of Operations Research, February 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10479-010-0828-5
Authors

Edmund K. Burke, Jakub Mareček, Andrew J. Parkes, Hana Rudová

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 2 3%
Brazil 2 3%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 66 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 17%
Student > Bachelor 9 13%
Professor 7 10%
Researcher 5 7%
Other 14 20%
Unknown 11 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 20 28%
Computer Science 19 27%
Business, Management and Accounting 9 13%
Mathematics 8 11%
Decision Sciences 2 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 13 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2012.
All research outputs
#18,304,874
of 22,663,150 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Operations Research
#553
of 715 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,479
of 182,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Operations Research
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,150 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 715 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,349 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.