You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Rejecting Catastrophe: The Case of the Justinianic Plague*
|
---|---|
Published in |
Past & Present, July 2019
|
DOI | 10.1093/pastj/gtz009 |
Authors |
Lee Mordechai, Merle Eisenberg |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 6 | 12% |
United States | 5 | 10% |
Canada | 2 | 4% |
France | 2 | 4% |
Singapore | 1 | 2% |
South Africa | 1 | 2% |
Australia | 1 | 2% |
Ireland | 1 | 2% |
Japan | 1 | 2% |
Other | 5 | 10% |
Unknown | 25 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 33 | 66% |
Scientists | 11 | 22% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 10% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 44 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 18% |
Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
Researcher | 4 | 9% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 17 | 39% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Arts and Humanities | 13 | 30% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 11% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 20 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 169. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2023.
All research outputs
#244,371
of 25,714,183 outputs
Outputs from Past & Present
#13
of 1,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,700
of 360,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Past & Present
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,714,183 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,000 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,956 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.