| Title |
The use of purposeful sampling in a qualitative evidence synthesis: A worked example on sexual adjustment to a cancer trajectory
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, February 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12874-016-0114-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Charlotte Benoot, Karin Hannes, Johan Bilsen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 574 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 572 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 107 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 78 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 54 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 44 | 8% |
| Researcher | 40 | 7% |
| Other | 95 | 17% |
| Unknown | 156 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 69 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 64 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 62 | 11% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 55 | 10% |
| Psychology | 36 | 6% |
| Other | 111 | 19% |
| Unknown | 177 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2016.
All research outputs
#16,681,672
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,605
of 2,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,024
of 315,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#23
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,318 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,259 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.