↓ Skip to main content

Interfering with activity in the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex via TMS affects social impressions updating

Overview of attention for article published in Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
Title
Interfering with activity in the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex via TMS affects social impressions updating
Published in
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, March 2016
DOI 10.3758/s13415-016-0419-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chiara Ferrari, Tomaso Vecchi, Alexander Todorov, Zaira Cattaneo

Abstract

In our everyday social interactions we often need to deal with others' unpredictable behaviors. Integrating unexpected information in a consistent representation of another agent is a cognitively demanding process. Several neuroimaging studies point to the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) as a critical structure in mediating social evaluations. Our aim here was to shed light on the possible causal role of the mPFC in the dynamic process of forming and updating social impressions about others. We addressed this issue by suppressing activity in the mPFC by means of 1 Hz offline transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) prior to a task requiring participants to evaluate other agents' trustworthiness after reading about their social behavior. In two different experiments, we found that inhibiting activity in the mPFC increased perceived trustworthiness when inconsistent information about one agent's behavior was provided. In turn, when only negative or positive behaviors of a person were described, TMS over the mPFC did not affect judgments. Our results indicate that the mPFC is causally involved in mediating social impressions updating-at least in cases in which judgment is uncertain due to conflicting information to be processed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 70 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 17%
Student > Bachelor 12 17%
Student > Master 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 12 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 25 35%
Neuroscience 14 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 1%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 20 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2016.
All research outputs
#21,500,614
of 24,003,070 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
#899
of 974 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#261,974
of 304,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
#17
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,003,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 974 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,230 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.