You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparative effectiveness of teriflunomide vs dimethyl fumarate in multiple sclerosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neurology, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1212/wnl.0000000000007938 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David-Axel Laplaud, Romain Casey, Laetitia Barbin, Marc Debouverie, Jérôme De Sèze, David Brassat, Sandrine Wiertlewski, Bruno Brochet, Jean Pelletier, Patrick Vermersch, Gilles Edan, Christine Lebrun-Frenay, Pierre Clavelou, Eric Thouvenot, Jean-Philippe Camdessanché, Ayman Tourbah, Bruno Stankoff, Abdullatif Al Khedr, Philippe Cabre, Catherine Lubetzki, Caroline Papeix, Eric Berger, Olivier Heinzlef, Thomas Debroucker, Thibault Moreau, Olivier Gout, Bertrand Bourre, Abir Wahab, Pierre Labauge, Laurent Magy, Gilles Defer, Anne-Marie Guennoc, Nicolas Maubeuge, Céline Labeyrie, Ivania Patry, Chantal Nifle, Olivier Casez, Laure Michel, Fabien Rollot, Emmanuelle Leray, Sandra Vukusic, Yohann Foucher, on behalf of the SFSEP and OFSEP groups, on behalf of the SFSEP and OFSEP groups, B. Fontaine, R. Marignier, F. Durand-Dubief, G. Mathey, E. Le Page, D. Peaureaux-Averseng, J.C. Ouallet, A. Ruet, N. Collongues, P. Hautecoeur, H. Zephir, E. Maillard, M. Cohen, N. Derache, P. Branger, X. Ayrignac, C. Carra-Dalliere, A. Fromont, L. Chamard-Witkowski, F. Taithe, X. Moisset, B. Audoin, A. Rico-Lamy, G. Castelnovo, C. Giannesini, O. Fagniez, C. Bensa, A. Gueguen, I. Tabellah Kasonde, A. De Vilmarest, A. Montcuquet, M. Vaillants, S. Beltran, A. Creange, S. Ayache, M. Abdellaoui, C. Pottier, I. Slesari, V. Deburghraeve, J.P. Neau, J. Servan, F. Pico, C. Henry, K. Hankiewicz |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 22% |
| Spain | 5 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 7% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 70% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 22% |
| Scientists | 1 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 86 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 16% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 13% |
| Professor | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 16% |
| Unknown | 27 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 30% |
| Neuroscience | 15 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 2% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 31 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2019.
All research outputs
#1,494,419
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Neurology
#2,636
of 21,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,370
of 364,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurology
#49
of 338 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,329 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 338 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.