↓ Skip to main content

Commonalities and differences in legal euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide in three countries: a population-level comparison

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Public Health, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
Title
Commonalities and differences in legal euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide in three countries: a population-level comparison
Published in
International Journal of Public Health, July 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00038-019-01281-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sigrid Dierickx, Bregje Onwuteaka-Philipsen, Yolanda Penders, Joachim Cohen, Agnes van der Heide, Milo A. Puhan, Sarah Ziegler, Georg Bosshard, Luc Deliens, Kenneth Chambaere

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 80 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 14%
Researcher 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Student > Master 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 32 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 13%
Psychology 5 6%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 35 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2020.
All research outputs
#8,266,724
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Public Health
#852
of 1,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,034
of 360,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Public Health
#11
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,902 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,043 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.