| Title |
Outcome for Children Receiving the Early Start Denver Model Before and After 48 Months
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, March 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10803-016-2777-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Giacomo Vivanti, Cheryl Dissanayake, The Victorian ASELCC Team |
| Abstract |
The Early Start Denver Model (ESDM) is an intervention program recommended for pre-schoolers with autism ages 12-48 months. The rationale for this recommendation is the potential for intervention to affect developmental trajectories during early sensitive periods. We investigated outcomes of 32 children aged 18-48 months and 28 children aged 48-62 months receiving the ESDM for one year (approximately 20 h per week). Younger children achieved superior verbal DQ gains compared to their older counterparts. There were no group differences with respect to non-verbal DQ and adaptive behavior (with both age-groups undergoing significant change), or ASD severity (with neither age-group showing improvements on the ADOS). The association between verbal DQ gains and age at intake was moderated by baseline verbal level. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 19% |
| Denmark | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 69% |
| Scientists | 4 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 237 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 234 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 37 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 42 | 18% |
| Unknown | 62 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 79 | 33% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 13 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 29 | 12% |
| Unknown | 73 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2022.
All research outputs
#2,256,525
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#960
of 5,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,851
of 316,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#11
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.