| Title |
Provision and accessibility of primary healthcare services for people who are homeless: a qualitative study of patient perspectives in the UK
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp19x704633 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ellie Gunner, Sat Kartar Chandan, Sarah Marwick, Karen Saunders, Sarah Burwood, Asma Yahyouche, Vibhu Paudyal |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 69 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 45 | 65% |
| Ireland | 2 | 3% |
| Comoros | 1 | 1% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 1% |
| Oman | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 19 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 40 | 58% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 16 | 23% |
| Scientists | 12 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 178 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 178 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 12% |
| Researcher | 15 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 25 | 14% |
| Unknown | 72 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 6% |
| Psychology | 7 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 20 | 11% |
| Unknown | 75 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 101. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2019.
All research outputs
#427,753
of 25,726,194 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#168
of 4,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,723
of 360,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#12
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,726,194 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,932 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,788 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.