Title |
Clarifying differences between reviews within evidence ecosystems
|
---|---|
Published in |
Systematic Reviews, July 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13643-019-1089-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
David Gough, James Thomas, Sandy Oliver |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 116 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 36 | 31% |
Canada | 10 | 9% |
United States | 7 | 6% |
Spain | 4 | 3% |
Ireland | 4 | 3% |
New Zealand | 2 | 2% |
South Africa | 2 | 2% |
Australia | 2 | 2% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Other | 8 | 7% |
Unknown | 40 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 60 | 52% |
Scientists | 31 | 27% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 17 | 15% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 8 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 145 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 12% |
Researcher | 16 | 11% |
Student > Master | 16 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 10% |
Unspecified | 9 | 6% |
Other | 34 | 23% |
Unknown | 38 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 20 | 14% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 10% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 11 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 7% |
Unspecified | 9 | 6% |
Other | 41 | 28% |
Unknown | 40 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 78. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2023.
All research outputs
#560,316
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#63
of 2,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,667
of 360,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#4
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,911 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.