| Title |
Improving flood damage assessment models in Italy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Natural Hazards, March 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11069-016-2286-0 |
| Authors |
Mattia Amadio, Jaroslav Mysiak, Lorenzo Carrera, Elco Koks |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 118 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 19% |
| Researcher | 23 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 27 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 35 | 29% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 15 | 12% |
| Environmental Science | 15 | 12% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 6 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 36 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2016.
All research outputs
#18,449,393
of 22,858,915 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#1,533
of 1,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,000
of 300,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#33
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,858,915 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,823 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,567 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.