| Title |
Computer-aided argument mapping in an EFL setting: does technology precede traditional paper and pencil approach in developing critical thinking?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Educational technology research and development, February 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11423-016-9431-z |
| Authors |
Maryam Eftekhari, Elaheh Sotoudehnama, S. Susan Marandi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 122 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 23 | 19% |
| Unknown | 39 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 17 | 14% |
| Arts and Humanities | 15 | 12% |
| Linguistics | 12 | 10% |
| Psychology | 10 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 21 | 17% |
| Unknown | 44 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2023.
All research outputs
#3,903,149
of 24,157,645 outputs
Outputs from Educational technology research and development
#110
of 1,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,199
of 303,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Educational technology research and development
#2
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,157,645 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,068 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 303,401 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.