↓ Skip to main content

Long‐term Outcomes After Deep Vein Thrombosis: Postphlebitic Syndrome and Quality of Life

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Internal Medicine, December 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
121 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
Title
Long‐term Outcomes After Deep Vein Thrombosis: Postphlebitic Syndrome and Quality of Life
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine, December 2001
DOI 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.06419.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susan R. Kahn, Susan Solymoss, Donna L. Lamping, Lucien Abenhaim

Abstract

In this review, we critically assess the literature on the incidence of postphlebitic syndrome, risk factors for its occurrence, available therapeutic options, and its effects on quality of life. As well, we describe available tools to measure postphlebitic syndrome. Recent prospective studies indicate that postphlebitic syndrome, a chronic, potentially disabling condition characterized by leg swelling, pain, venous ectasia, and skin induration, is established by 1 year after deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in 17% to 50% of patients. The only prospectively identified risk factor for its occurrence is recurrent ipsilateral DVT. In the sole randomized study available, daily use of elastic compression stockings after proximal DVT reduced the incidence of postphlebitic syndrome by 50%. Treatment options for established postphlebitic syndrome are limited, but include compression stockings and intermittent compressive therapy with an extremity pump for severe cases. To date, quality of life after DVT has received little attention in the literature. The recent development of the VEINES-QOL questionnaire, a validated venous-disease-specific measure of quality of life, should encourage researchers to include quality of life as a routine outcome measure after DVT. There is no criterion standard for the diagnosis of postphlebitic syndrome, but a validated clinical scoring system does exist. More research on postphlebitic syndrome is needed to enable us to provide DVT patients with comprehensive, evidence-based information regarding their long-term prognosis, to help quantify the prevalence and health care burden of postphlebitic syndrome, and by identifying predictors of poor outcome, to develop new preventive strategies in patients at risk of developing this condition.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Turkey 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 76 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 14%
Student > Postgraduate 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 13%
Student > Master 9 11%
Other 7 9%
Other 17 22%
Unknown 15 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 57%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Sports and Recreations 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 18 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2015.
All research outputs
#15,169,949
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#5,460
of 8,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,267
of 131,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#186
of 209 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,175 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,412 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 209 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.