↓ Skip to main content

More on the strength of evidence in forensic pathology

Overview of attention for article published in Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
More on the strength of evidence in forensic pathology
Published in
Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology, March 2016
DOI 10.1007/s12024-016-9766-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marijke Buiskool, Hubert G. T. Nijs, Wouter A. Karst, Charles E. H. Berger

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 23%
Researcher 2 15%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Professor 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 46%
Unknown 7 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2016.
All research outputs
#7,710,353
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology
#185
of 1,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,898
of 305,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology
#9
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,014 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,717 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.