| Title |
Diet and the risk of head and neck cancer: a pooled analysis in the INHANCE consortium
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer Causes & Control, October 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10552-011-9857-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shu-Chun Chuang, Mazda Jenab, Julia E. Heck, Cristina Bosetti, Renato Talamini, Keitaro Matsuo, Xavier Castellsague, Silvia Franceschi, Rolando Herrero, Deborah M. Winn, Carlo La Vecchia, Hal Morgenstern, Zuo-Feng Zhang, Fabio Levi, Luigino Dal Maso, Karl Kelsey, Michael D. McClean, Thomas Vaughan, Philip Lazarus, Joshua Muscat, Heribert Ramroth, Chu Chen, Stephen M. Schwartz, Jose Eluf-Neto, Richard B. Hayes, Mark Purdue, Stefania Boccia, Gabriella Cadoni, David Zaridze, Sergio Koifman, Maria Paula Curado, Wolfgang Ahrens, Simone Benhamou, Elena Matos, Pagona Lagiou, Neonilla Szeszenia-Dabrowska, Andrew F. Olshan, Leticia Fernandez, Ana Menezes, Antonio Agudo, Alexander W. Daudt, Franco Merletti, Gary J. Macfarlane, Kristina Kjaerheim, Dana Mates, Ivana Holcatova, Stimson Schantz, Guo-Pei Yu, Lorenzo Simonato, Hermann Brenner, Heiko Mueller, David I. Conway, Peter Thomson, Eleonora Fabianova, Ariana Znaor, Peter Rudnai, Claire M. Healy, Gilles Ferro, Paul Brennan, Paolo Boffetta, Mia Hashibe |
| Abstract |
We investigated the association between diet and head and neck cancer (HNC) risk using data from the International Head and Neck Cancer Epidemiology (INHANCE) consortium. The INHANCE pooled data included 22 case-control studies with 14,520 cases and 22,737 controls. Center-specific quartiles among the controls were used for food groups, and frequencies per week were used for single food items. A dietary pattern score combining high fruit and vegetable intake and low red meat intake was created. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the dietary items on the risk of HNC were estimated with a two-stage random-effects logistic regression model. An inverse association was observed for higher-frequency intake of fruit (4th vs. 1st quartile OR = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.43-0.62, p (trend) < 0.01) and vegetables (OR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.49-0.90, p (trend) = 0.01). Intake of red meat (OR = 1.40, 95% CI = 1.13-1.74, p (trend) = 0.13) and processed meat (OR = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.14-1.65, p (trend) < 0.01) was positively associated with HNC risk. Higher dietary pattern scores, reflecting high fruit/vegetable and low red meat intake, were associated with reduced HNC risk (per score increment OR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.84-0.97). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 17% |
| Kuwait | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| France | 2 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 187 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 10% |
| Researcher | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 9% |
| Professor | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 51 | 27% |
| Unknown | 48 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 88 | 46% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 9% |
| Unknown | 56 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2019.
All research outputs
#3,189,654
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Causes & Control
#349
of 2,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,979
of 157,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Causes & Control
#8
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,339 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,254 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.