| Title |
Use of Frightening Devices in Wildlife Damage Management
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Integrated Pest Management Reviews, March 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1025760032566 |
| Authors |
Jason M. Gilsdorf, Scott E. Hygnstrom, Kurt C. VerCauteren |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 178 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 2 | 1% |
| South Africa | 2 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Guatemala | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 166 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 38 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 12% |
| Other | 20 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 8% |
| Other | 20 | 11% |
| Unknown | 39 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 72 | 40% |
| Environmental Science | 42 | 24% |
| Engineering | 6 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Unknown | 43 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2019.
All research outputs
#4,312,846
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Integrated Pest Management Reviews
#2
of 27 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,161
of 49,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Integrated Pest Management Reviews
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 27 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one scored the same or higher as 25 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 49,733 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them