| Title |
Systematic review of diagnostic accuracy of patient history, clinical findings, and physical tests in the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Spine Journal, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00586-019-06048-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christian Jaeger Cook, Chad E. Cook, Michael P. Reiman, Anand B. Joshi, William Richardson, Alessandra N. Garcia |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 73 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 16% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 14% |
| France | 5 | 7% |
| Australia | 5 | 7% |
| Spain | 5 | 7% |
| Brazil | 4 | 5% |
| India | 2 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 17 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 57 | 78% |
| Scientists | 13 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 76 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 14% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Researcher | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Unknown | 29 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 17% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 3% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 33 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2021.
All research outputs
#956,645
of 25,211,948 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#73
of 5,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,559
of 352,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#2
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,211,948 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,209 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,390 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.