Title |
Diabetes susceptibility in ethnic minority groups from Turkey, Vietnam, Sri Lanka and Pakistan compared with Norwegians - the association with adiposity is strongest for ethnic minority women
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, March 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-12-150 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Anne Karen Jenum, Lien My Diep, Gerd Holmboe-Ottesen, Ingar Morten K Holme, Bernadette Nirmar Kumar, Kåre Inge Birkeland |
Abstract |
The difference in diabetes susceptibility by ethnic background is poorly understood. The aim of this study was to assess the association between adiposity and diabetes in four ethnic minority groups compared with Norwegians, and take into account confounding by socioeconomic position. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Norway | 4 | 57% |
United States | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Portugal | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 98 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 21 | 21% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 14 | 14% |
Researcher | 9 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
Other | 10 | 10% |
Unknown | 28 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 23% |
Social Sciences | 17 | 17% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 11% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
Psychology | 3 | 3% |
Other | 8 | 8% |
Unknown | 33 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2017.
All research outputs
#3,594,396
of 22,663,969 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#3,914
of 14,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,046
of 155,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#31
of 215 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,969 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,743 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,719 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 215 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.