↓ Skip to main content

Ship-borne Nonindigenous Species Diminish Great Lakes Ecosystem Services

Overview of attention for article published in Ecosystems, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#34 of 1,251)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
Title
Ship-borne Nonindigenous Species Diminish Great Lakes Ecosystem Services
Published in
Ecosystems, February 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10021-012-9522-6
Authors

John D. Rothlisberger, David C. Finnoff, Roger M. Cooke, David M. Lodge

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 5%
Canada 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 114 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 21%
Student > Master 24 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 18%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 21 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 44 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 26%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 2%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 25 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2022.
All research outputs
#676,638
of 23,509,982 outputs
Outputs from Ecosystems
#34
of 1,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,134
of 156,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecosystems
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,509,982 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,251 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,856 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.