↓ Skip to main content

Sexual Size Dimorphism, Canine Dimorphism, and Male-Male Competition in Primates

Overview of attention for article published in Human Nature, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#18 of 547)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
25 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
157 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
226 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Sexual Size Dimorphism, Canine Dimorphism, and Male-Male Competition in Primates
Published in
Human Nature, March 2012
DOI 10.1007/s12110-012-9130-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. Michael Plavcan

Abstract

Sexual size dimorphism is generally associated with sexual selection via agonistic male competition in nonhuman primates. These primate models play an important role in understanding the origins and evolution of human behavior. Human size dimorphism is often hypothesized to be associated with high rates of male violence and polygyny. This raises the question of whether human dimorphism and patterns of male violence are inherited from a common ancestor with chimpanzees or are uniquely derived. Here I review patterns of, and causal models for, dimorphism in humans and other primates. While dimorphism in primates is associated with agonistic male mate competition, a variety of factors can affect male and female size, and thereby dimorphism. The causes of human sexual size dimorphism are uncertain, and could involve several non-mutually-exclusive mechanisms, such as mate competition, resource competition, intergroup violence, and female choice. A phylogenetic reconstruction of the evolution of dimorphism, including fossil hominins, indicates that the modern human condition is derived. This suggests that at least some behavioral similarities with Pan associated with dimorphism may have arisen independently, and not directly from a common ancestor.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 226 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Unknown 218 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 52 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 17%
Student > Master 28 12%
Researcher 22 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 7%
Other 35 15%
Unknown 36 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 87 38%
Psychology 31 14%
Social Sciences 26 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 4%
Arts and Humanities 8 4%
Other 26 12%
Unknown 38 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 229. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2024.
All research outputs
#166,696
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Human Nature
#18
of 547 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#639
of 168,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Nature
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 547 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.