| Title |
Neighborhood Environment and Health of Injured Urban Black Men
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40615-019-00609-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Aimee J. Palumbo, Douglas J. Wiebe, Nancy Kassam-Adams, Therese S. Richmond |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 44 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 11% |
| Researcher | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 8 | 18% |
| Unknown | 11 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 6 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 9% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 16% |
| Unknown | 15 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2019.
All research outputs
#1,516,140
of 23,152,542 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
#126
of 1,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,787
of 350,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
#5
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,152,542 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,032 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,925 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.