↓ Skip to main content

Ovarian Microcystic Stromal Tumor

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Gynecological Pathology, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ovarian Microcystic Stromal Tumor
Published in
International Journal of Gynecological Pathology, November 2016
DOI 10.1097/pgp.0000000000000289
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cheng Liu, Renee L. Gallagher, Gareth R. Price, Elizabeth Bolton, Christopher Joy, James Harraway, Deon J. Venter, Jane E. Armes

Abstract

Microcystic stromal tumor (MST) is a rare tumor of presumed sex-cord stromal differentiation. We present a case of MST arising within a patient with constitutional 5q deletion syndrome, whose deletion encompassed the APC gene. Genomic analysis of the MST revealed a point mutation in the remaining APC allele, predicted to result in abnormal splicing of Exon 7. Subsequent clinical investigation revealed multiple gastrointestinal polyps qualifying for a diagnosis of familial adenomatous polyposis. This case emphasizes the importance of an aberrant Wnt/β-catenin pathway in the development of MST and adds credence to the inclusion of MST as a rare phenotype of familial adenomatous polyposis. In a search for additional genetic aberrations which may contribute to the development of this rare tumor, genomic analysis revealed a frameshift mutation in FANCD2, a protein which plays a key role in DNA repair. This protein is expressed in human ovarian stromal cells and FANCD2-knockout mice are known to develop sex cord-stromal tumors, factors which further support a possible role of aberrant FANCD2 in the development of MST.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 20%
Researcher 3 20%
Other 1 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Professor 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 4 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 60%
Social Sciences 1 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Unknown 4 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2017.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Gynecological Pathology
#648
of 759 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#277,943
of 317,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Gynecological Pathology
#9
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 759 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,808 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.