Title |
Fuzzy cross-entropy
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Uncertainty Analysis and Applications, February 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40467-015-0029-5 |
Authors |
Xiang Li |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 60% |
Other | 2 | 20% |
Researcher | 1 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mathematics | 4 | 40% |
Computer Science | 3 | 30% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 10% |
Decision Sciences | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 1 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2019.
All research outputs
#7,594,478
of 23,152,542 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Uncertainty Analysis and Applications
#2
of 5 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,859
of 359,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Uncertainty Analysis and Applications
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,152,542 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one scored the same or higher as 3 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,528 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.