↓ Skip to main content

Ethnic difference of clinical vertebral fracture risk

Overview of attention for article published in Osteoporosis International, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
114 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Ethnic difference of clinical vertebral fracture risk
Published in
Osteoporosis International, April 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00198-011-1627-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

C. H. Bow, E. Cheung, C. L. Cheung, S. M. Xiao, C. Loong, C. Soong, K. C. Tan, M. M. Luckey, J. A. Cauley, S. Fujiwara, A. W. C. Kung

Abstract

Vertebral fractures are the most common osteoporotic fractures. Data on the vertebral fracture risk in Asia remain sparse. This study observed that Hong Kong Chinese and Japanese populations have a less dramatic increase in hip fracture rates associated with age than Caucasians, but the vertebral fracture rates were higher, resulting in a high vertebral-to-hip fracture ratio. As a result, estimation of the absolute fracture risk for Asians may need to be readjusted for the higher clinical vertebral fracture rate.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
Morocco 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 55 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Other 14 24%
Unknown 14 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 41%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Computer Science 2 3%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 14 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2015.
All research outputs
#7,170,310
of 22,663,969 outputs
Outputs from Osteoporosis International
#1,257
of 3,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,638
of 108,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Osteoporosis International
#10
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,596 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,714 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.