You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Coral Trait Database, a curated database of trait information for coral species from the global oceans
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Data, March 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1038/sdata.2016.17 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joshua S. Madin, Kristen D. Anderson, Magnus Heide Andreasen, Tom C.L. Bridge, Stephen D. Cairns, Sean R. Connolly, Emily S. Darling, Marcela Diaz, Daniel S. Falster, Erik C. Franklin, Ruth D. Gates, Aaron M.T. Harmer, Mia O. Hoogenboom, Danwei Huang, Sally A. Keith, Matthew A. Kosnik, Chao-Yang Kuo, Janice M. Lough, Catherine E. Lovelock, Osmar Luiz, Julieta Martinelli, Toni Mizerek, John M. Pandolfi, Xavier Pochon, Morgan S. Pratchett, Hollie M. Putnam, T. Edward Roberts, Michael Stat, Carden C. Wallace, Elizabeth Widman, Andrew H. Baird |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 87 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 19 | 22% |
| Australia | 12 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 8% |
| Denmark | 4 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 2% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 26 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 46 | 53% |
| Scientists | 36 | 41% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 345 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 4 | 1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 334 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 76 | 22% |
| Researcher | 66 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 47 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 5% |
| Other | 39 | 11% |
| Unknown | 77 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 122 | 35% |
| Environmental Science | 82 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 13 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 18 | 5% |
| Unknown | 91 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 101. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2020.
All research outputs
#425,355
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Data
#134
of 3,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,621
of 316,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Data
#5
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,441 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,296 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.