↓ Skip to main content

Do ostensive cues affect object processing in children with and without autism? A test of natural pedagogy theory

Overview of attention for article published in Psychological Research, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Do ostensive cues affect object processing in children with and without autism? A test of natural pedagogy theory
Published in
Psychological Research, July 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00426-019-01223-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tobias Schuwerk, Johannes Bätz, Birgit Träuble, Beate Sodian, Markus Paulus

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Researcher 2 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Librarian 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 10 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 4 19%
Social Sciences 3 14%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Mathematics 1 5%
Neuroscience 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 10 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2019.
All research outputs
#18,025,055
of 23,152,542 outputs
Outputs from Psychological Research
#741
of 974 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#242,440
of 346,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychological Research
#14
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,152,542 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 974 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,553 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.