| Title |
The impact of social norms interventions on clinical behaviour change among health workers: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-019-1077-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sarah Cotterill, Rachael Powell, Sarah Rhodes, Benjamin Brown, Jane Roberts, Mei Yee Tang, Jack Wilkinson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 14% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Ireland | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 13 | 62% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 62% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 19% |
| Scientists | 4 | 19% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 84 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 33 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 7% |
| Psychology | 6 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 19% |
| Unknown | 32 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2019.
All research outputs
#2,895,088
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#515
of 2,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,154
of 361,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#18
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,129 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.