↓ Skip to main content

A Basic Tutorial on Cyclic Voltammetry for the Investigation of Electroactive Microbial Biofilms

Overview of attention for article published in Chemistry - An Asian Journal, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
175 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
647 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Basic Tutorial on Cyclic Voltammetry for the Investigation of Electroactive Microbial Biofilms
Published in
Chemistry - An Asian Journal, January 2012
DOI 10.1002/asia.201100740
Pubmed ID
Authors

Falk Harnisch, Stefano Freguia

Abstract

Electroactive microbial biofilms and the microorganisms embedded therein are not only of crucial fundamental interest because they play an important role in redox cycles that occur in nature, they are also attracting increasing attention as key component of microbial bioelectrochemcial systems (BES). In these systems, interconversion of chemical and electrical energy and the associated exchange of electrons between living microbial cells and solid electrodes take place. The fascinating prospects and promise of BES technology have considerably increased the research on electroactive microbial biofilms over recent years. As a consequence, the research community is truly multifaceted, with backgrounds and interests ranging from molecular biology, via chemistry, to engineering. One of the most-important and most-widespread applied electrochemical techniques is cyclic voltammetry (CV). This Focus Review illustrates the power of this electrochemical technique and the versatility of the information that can be gained by its application for the electrochemical freshman. This Review will also pinpoint hurdles in using this technique, especially for the non-electrochemist, and the limitations of present models for data analysis. Because it aims to be a basic introduction, this Review will not discuss the latest intricacies in the field.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 647 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 9 1%
United States 4 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Belgium 3 <1%
Italy 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 616 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 196 30%
Student > Master 102 16%
Researcher 94 15%
Student > Bachelor 47 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 44 7%
Other 57 9%
Unknown 107 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 114 18%
Engineering 93 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 76 12%
Environmental Science 65 10%
Materials Science 37 6%
Other 119 18%
Unknown 143 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2020.
All research outputs
#14,130,024
of 24,629,540 outputs
Outputs from Chemistry - An Asian Journal
#1,057
of 5,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,061
of 255,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chemistry - An Asian Journal
#15
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,629,540 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,904 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,073 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.