↓ Skip to main content

An integrated interface for peripheral neural system recording and stimulation: system design, electrical tests and in-vivo results

Overview of attention for article published in Biomedical Microdevices, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
An integrated interface for peripheral neural system recording and stimulation: system design, electrical tests and in-vivo results
Published in
Biomedical Microdevices, March 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10544-016-0043-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Caterina Carboni, Lorenzo Bisoni, Nicola Carta, Roberto Puddu, Stanisa Raspopovic, Xavier Navarro, Luigi Raffo, Massimo Barbaro

Abstract

The prototype of an electronic bi-directional interface between the Peripheral Nervous System (PNS) and a neuro-controlled hand prosthesis is presented. The system is composed of 2 integrated circuits: a standard CMOS device for neural recording and a HVCMOS device for neural stimulation. The integrated circuits have been realized in 2 different 0.35μ m CMOS processes available from ams. The complete system incorporates 8 channels each including the analog front-end, the A/D conversion, based on a sigma delta architecture and a programmable stimulation module implemented as a 5-bit current DAC; two voltage boosters supply the output stimulation stage with a programmable voltage scalable up to 17V. Successful in-vivo experiments with rats having a TIME electrode implanted in the sciatic nerve were carried out, showing the capability of recording neural signals in the tens of microvolts, with a global noise of 7μ V r m s , and to selectively elicit the tibial and plantar muscles using different active sites of the electrode.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Germany 1 3%
Unknown 37 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 15%
Researcher 5 13%
Student > Master 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 9 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 20 50%
Computer Science 3 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 10 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2016.
All research outputs
#15,706,732
of 24,137,933 outputs
Outputs from Biomedical Microdevices
#565
of 773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,197
of 305,097 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biomedical Microdevices
#5
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,137,933 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 773 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,097 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.