You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A clinical scoring system for congenital contractural arachnodactyly
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genetics in Medicine, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41436-019-0609-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ilse Meerschaut, Shana De Coninck, Wouter Steyaert, Angela Barnicoat, Allan Bayat, Francesco Benedicenti, Siren Berland, Edward M. Blair, Jeroen Breckpot, Anna de Burca, Anne Destrée, Sixto García-Miñaúr, Andrew J. Green, Bernadette C. Hanna, Kathelijn Keymolen, Marije Koopmans, Damien Lederer, Melissa Lees, Cheryl Longman, Sally Ann Lynch, Alison M. Male, Fiona McKenzie, Isabelle Migeotte, Ercan Mihci, Banu Nur, Florence Petit, Juliette Piard, Frank S. Plasschaert, Anita Rauch, Pascale Ribaï, Iratxe Salcedo Pacheco, Franco Stanzial, Irene Stolte-Dijkstra, Irene Valenzuela, Vinod Varghese, Pradeep C. Vasudevan, Emma Wakeling, Carina Wallgren-Pettersson, Paul Coucke, Anne De Paepe, Daniël De Wolf, Sofie Symoens, Bert Callewaert |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 1 | 11% |
| Brazil | 1 | 11% |
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| Finland | 1 | 11% |
| Spain | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 44% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 22% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 7 | 18% |
| Researcher | 6 | 15% |
| Librarian | 3 | 8% |
| Professor | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 23% |
| Unknown | 10 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 35% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 17 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2021.
All research outputs
#4,282,008
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Genetics in Medicine
#1,310
of 2,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,193
of 359,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetics in Medicine
#44
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,945 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,968 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.