↓ Skip to main content

肩関節の安定化機構

Overview of attention for article published in Katakansetsu, September 1991
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
肩関節の安定化機構
Published in
Katakansetsu, September 1991
DOI 10.11296/katakansetsu1977.15.1_13
Authors

筒井 廣明, 山本 龍二, 安楽 岩嗣, 三原 研一, 今里 有紀彦, 保刈 成

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 25%
Researcher 1 25%
Student > Postgraduate 1 25%
Student > Master 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 1 25%
Sports and Recreations 1 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 25%
Engineering 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2020.
All research outputs
#15,526,423
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Katakansetsu
#7
of 54 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,762
of 16,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Katakansetsu
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 54 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 16,022 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them