You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Conservation Research Is Not Happening Where It Is Most Needed
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Biology, March 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002413 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kerrie A. Wilson, Nancy A. Auerbach, Katerina Sam, Ariana G. Magini, Alexander St. L. Moss, Simone D. Langhans, Sugeng Budiharta, Dilva Terzano, Erik Meijaard |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 277 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 34 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 26 | 9% |
| Australia | 19 | 7% |
| Canada | 6 | 2% |
| Brazil | 5 | 2% |
| Mexico | 5 | 2% |
| Indonesia | 5 | 2% |
| Spain | 4 | 1% |
| France | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 56 | 20% |
| Unknown | 113 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 157 | 57% |
| Scientists | 111 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 8 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 397 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 1% |
| Brazil | 4 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | 2% |
| Unknown | 369 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 71 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 65 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 51 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 46 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 5% |
| Other | 68 | 17% |
| Unknown | 77 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 145 | 37% |
| Environmental Science | 89 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 12 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 3% |
| Other | 34 | 9% |
| Unknown | 93 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 260. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2020.
All research outputs
#142,643
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Biology
#294
of 9,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,535
of 317,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Biology
#5
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,159 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 47.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,761 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.