| Title |
Nature conservation: priority-setting needs a global change
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-012-0428-6 |
| Authors |
Lisa Freudenberger, Peter Hobson, Martin Schluck, Stefan Kreft, Katrin Vohland, Henning Sommer, Steffen Reichle, Christoph Nowicki, Wilhelm Barthlott, Pierre L. Ibisch |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 2% |
| Germany | 3 | 1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Austria | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 2% |
| Unknown | 179 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 54 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 34 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 15% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 36 | 18% |
| Unknown | 21 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 72 | 36% |
| Environmental Science | 69 | 34% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 8 | 4% |
| Engineering | 3 | 1% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 3% |
| Unknown | 40 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2016.
All research outputs
#1,917,327
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#272
of 2,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,443
of 288,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#1
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,695 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.