| Title |
Remote Real-Time Ultrasound Supervision via Commercially Available and Low-Cost Tele-Ultrasound: a Mixed Methods Study of the Practical Feasibility and Users’ Acceptability in an Emergency Department
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Digital Imaging, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10278-018-0157-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stig Holm Jensen, Iben Duvald, Rasmus Aagaard, Stine Catharina Primdahl, Poul Petersen, Hans Kirkegaard, Jesper Weile |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
| Researcher | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 24% |
| Unknown | 19 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 9% |
| Engineering | 5 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 6% |
| Psychology | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 21 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2019.
All research outputs
#18,025,055
of 23,152,542 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Digital Imaging
#821
of 1,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#305,807
of 437,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Digital Imaging
#18
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,152,542 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,070 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,753 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.