| Title |
Robotic radical nephroureterectomy and segmental ureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a multi-institutional experience
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
World Journal of Urology, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00345-019-02790-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Riccardo Campi, Juliette Cotte, Francesco Sessa, Thomas Seisen, Riccardo Tellini, Daniele Amparore, Nicola Mormile, Aurélien Gobert, Andrea Mari, Francesco Porpiglia, Sergio Serni, Andrea Minervini, Morgan Rouprêt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 5 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 10% |
| France | 1 | 10% |
| Germany | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 1 | 10% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 30% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 30% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 10 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 28% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 7% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 11 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2020.
All research outputs
#5,509,333
of 23,152,542 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Urology
#546
of 2,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,345
of 350,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Urology
#23
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,152,542 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,123 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,025 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.