↓ Skip to main content

A MOD(ern) perspective on literature curation

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Genetics and Genomics, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
citeulike
8 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
Title
A MOD(ern) perspective on literature curation
Published in
Molecular Genetics and Genomics, March 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00438-010-0525-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jodi Hirschman, Tanya Z. Berardini, Harold J. Drabkin, Doug Howe

Abstract

Curation of biological data is a multi-faceted task whose goal is to create a structured, comprehensive, integrated, and accurate resource of current biological knowledge. These structured data facilitate the work of the scientific community by providing knowledge about genes or genomes and by generating validated connections between the data that yield new information and stimulate new research approaches. For the model organism databases (MODs), an important source of data is research publications. Every published paper containing experimental information about a particular model organism is a candidate for curation. All such papers are examined carefully by curators for relevant information. Here, four curators from different MODs describe the literature curation process and highlight approaches taken by the four MODs to address: (1) the decision process by which papers are selected, and (2) the identification and prioritization of the data contained in the paper. We will highlight some of the challenges that MOD biocurators face, and point to ways in which researchers and publishers can support the work of biocurators and the value of such support.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 15%
Mexico 3 5%
United Kingdom 2 4%
New Zealand 2 4%
Iceland 1 2%
Sweden 1 2%
Argentina 1 2%
France 1 2%
Unknown 36 65%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 42%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 13%
Student > Master 5 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Other 4 7%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 2 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 62%
Computer Science 8 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Engineering 2 4%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 3 5%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2015.
All research outputs
#4,659,861
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Genetics and Genomics
#298
of 3,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,461
of 102,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Genetics and Genomics
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,319 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,547 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them