| Title |
Return sweeps in reading: Processing implications of undersweep-fixations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3758/s13423-019-01636-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Timothy J. Slattery, Adam J. Parker |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 67% |
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 56% |
| Scientists | 4 | 44% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 22% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 11% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 15% |
| Unknown | 3 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 11 | 41% |
| Linguistics | 3 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 15% |
| Unknown | 3 | 11% |