| Title |
Does Ultrasound Correlate with Surgical or Histologic Findings in Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome? A Pilot Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, November 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11999-009-1174-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
A. M. Fearon, J. M. Scarvell, J. L. Cook, P. N. Smith |
| Abstract |
Greater trochanteric pain syndrome can be severely debilitating. Ideal imaging modalities are not established, treatments are not reliably evaluated, and the underlying pathology is not well understood. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Canada | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Ukraine | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 134 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 14% |
| Other | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 32 | 23% |
| Unknown | 31 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 60 | 44% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 9% |
| Sports and Recreations | 9 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Psychology | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Unknown | 42 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2013.
All research outputs
#14,503,514
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#4,352
of 7,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,241
of 179,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#17
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,324 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,875 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.