↓ Skip to main content

Bioenergy Potential of the United States Constrained by Satellite Observations of Existing Productivity

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Science & Technology, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bioenergy Potential of the United States Constrained by Satellite Observations of Existing Productivity
Published in
Environmental Science & Technology, March 2012
DOI 10.1021/es203935d
Pubmed ID
Authors

W. Kolby Smith, Cory C. Cleveland, Sasha C. Reed, Norman L. Miller, Steven W. Running

Abstract

United States (U.S.) energy policy includes an expectation that bioenergy will be a substantial future energy source. In particular, the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA) aims to increase annual U.S. biofuel (secondary bioenergy) production by more than 3-fold, from 40 to 136 billion liters ethanol, which implies an even larger increase in biomass demand (primary energy), from roughly 2.9 to 7.4 EJ yr(-1). However, our understanding of many of the factors used to establish such energy targets is far from complete, introducing significgant uncertainty into the feasibility of current estimates of bioenergy potential. Here, we utilized satellite-derived net primary productivity (NPP) data-measured for every 1 km(2) of the 7.2 million km(2) of vegetated land in the conterminous U.S.-to estimate primary bioenergy potential (PBP). Our results indicate that PBP of the conterminous U.S. ranges from roughly 5.9 to 22.2 EJ yr(-1), depending on land use. The low end of this range represents the potential when harvesting residues only, while the high end would require an annual biomass harvest over an area more than three times current U.S. agricultural extent. While EISA energy targets are theoretically achievable, we show that meeting these targets utilizing current technology would require either an 80% displacement of current crop harvest or the conversion of 60% of rangeland productivity. Accordingly, realistically constrained estimates of bioenergy potential are critical for effective incorporation of bioenergy into the national energy portfolio.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 11%
Canada 2 3%
France 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 66 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 36%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 21%
Professor 8 10%
Other 6 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 6%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 4 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 21 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 21%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 13%
Engineering 9 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 5%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 8 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2012.
All research outputs
#4,391,193
of 25,774,185 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science & Technology
#5,282
of 21,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,753
of 168,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science & Technology
#45
of 194 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,774,185 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,066 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,932 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 194 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.