| Title |
The benefits of systematic mapping to evidence-based environmental management
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ambio, March 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13280-016-0773-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Neal R. Haddaway, Claes Bernes, Bengt-Gunnar Jonsson, Katarina Hedlund |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 18% |
| Sweden | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 8 | 73% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 73% |
| Scientists | 2 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 236 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Malta | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 233 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 46 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 44 | 19% |
| Researcher | 42 | 18% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 8% |
| Other | 28 | 12% |
| Unknown | 39 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 64 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 51 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 20 | 8% |
| Arts and Humanities | 8 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 37 | 16% |
| Unknown | 50 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2023.
All research outputs
#2,828,596
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#544
of 1,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,538
of 333,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#11
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,954 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,784 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.