| Title |
Can we learn from the clinically significant face processing deficits, prosopagnosia and capgras delusion?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neuropsychology Review, December 1996
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf01874897 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elaine Wacholtz |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 27 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 14% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 8 | 28% |
| Unknown | 4 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 14 | 48% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2019.
All research outputs
#20,575,461
of 23,152,542 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychology Review
#435
of 458 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,588
of 92,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychology Review
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,152,542 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 458 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,272 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.