You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Whole-genome landscape of mucosal melanoma reveals diverse drivers and therapeutic targets
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature Communications, July 2019
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41467-019-11107-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Felicity Newell, Yan Kong, James S. Wilmott, Peter A. Johansson, Peter M. Ferguson, Chuanliang Cui, Zhongwu Li, Stephen H. Kazakoff, Hazel Burke, Tristan J. Dodds, Ann-Marie Patch, Katia Nones, Varsha Tembe, Ping Shang, Louise van der Weyden, Kim Wong, Oliver Holmes, Serigne Lo, Conrad Leonard, Scott Wood, Qinying Xu, Robert V. Rawson, Pamela Mukhopadhyay, Reinhard Dummer, Mitchell P. Levesque, Göran Jönsson, Xuan Wang, Iwei Yeh, Hong Wu, Nancy Joseph, Boris C. Bastian, Georgina V. Long, Andrew J. Spillane, Kerwin F. Shannon, John F. Thompson, Robyn P. M. Saw, David J. Adams, Lu Si, John V. Pearson, Nicholas K. Hayward, Nicola Waddell, Graham J. Mann, Jun Guo, Richard A. Scolyer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 13 | 25% |
Australia | 11 | 21% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
France | 1 | 2% |
Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
Japan | 1 | 2% |
Sweden | 1 | 2% |
China | 1 | 2% |
Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 6% |
Unknown | 18 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 27 | 51% |
Scientists | 16 | 30% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 11% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 166 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 15% |
Researcher | 24 | 14% |
Student > Master | 19 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 7% |
Other | 29 | 17% |
Unknown | 43 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 30% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 33 | 20% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 7% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 5 | 3% |
Engineering | 3 | 2% |
Other | 15 | 9% |
Unknown | 48 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2023.
All research outputs
#838,445
of 25,589,756 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#14,056
of 57,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,874
of 360,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#339
of 1,443 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,589,756 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 57,732 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,630 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,443 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.