| Title |
Does nociception monitor-guided anesthesia affect opioid consumption? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10877-019-00362-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fleur S. Meijer, Marieke Niesters, Monique van Velzen, Chris H. Martini, Erik Olofsen, Ruth Edry, Daniel I. Sessler, Eveline L. A. van Dorp, Albert Dahan, Martijn Boon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 67 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Researcher | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 19% |
| Unknown | 26 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 36% |
| Engineering | 5 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 25 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2019.
All research outputs
#18,025,055
of 23,152,542 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
#513
of 708 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#242,086
of 345,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
#14
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,152,542 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 708 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.