| Title |
Noninvasive mechanical ventilation in patients having declined tracheal intubation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-012-2746-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Élie Azoulay, Achille Kouatchet, Samir Jaber, Jérôme Lambert, Ferhat Meziani, Matthieu Schmidt, David Schnell, Satar Mortaza, Matthieu Conseil, Xavier Tchenio, Patrick Herbecq, Pierre Andrivet, Emmanuel Guerot, Ariane Lafabrie, Sébastien Perbet, Laurent Camous, Ralf Janssen-Langenstein, François Collet, Jonathan Messika, Stéphane Legriel, Xavier Fabre, Olivier Guisset, Samia Touati, Sarah Kilani, Michael Alves, Alain Mercat, Thomas Similowski, Laurent Papazian, Anne-Pascale Meert, Sylvie Chevret, Benoît Schlemmer, Laurent Brochard, Alexandre Demoule |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 152 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 20 | 13% |
| Researcher | 19 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 41 | 26% |
| Unknown | 35 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 70 | 44% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 4% |
| Psychology | 5 | 3% |
| Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 8% |
| Unknown | 42 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2016.
All research outputs
#18,449,393
of 22,858,915 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#4,435
of 4,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#215,718
of 277,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#37
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,858,915 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,991 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.2. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,766 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.