You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reliable Detection of Mismatch Repair Deficiency in Colorectal Cancers Using Mutational Load in Next-Generation Sequencing Panels.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Clinical Oncology, March 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1200/jco.2015.65.1067 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zsofia K Stadler, Francesca Battaglin, Sumit Middha, Jaclyn F Hechtman, Christina Tran, Andrea Cercek, Rona Yaeger, Neil H Segal, Anna M Varghese, Diane L Reidy-Lagunes, Nancy E Kemeny, Erin E Salo-Mullen, Asad Ashraf, Martin R Weiser, Julio Garcia-Aguilar, Mark E Robson, Kenneth Offit, Maria E Arcila, Michael F Berger, Jinru Shia, David B Solit, Leonard B Saltz |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 38% |
| United States | 3 | 23% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 46% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 38% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 172 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 41 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 9% |
| Other | 15 | 9% |
| Other | 29 | 17% |
| Unknown | 33 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 26% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 33 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 16% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 10% |
| Unknown | 41 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2017.
All research outputs
#4,853,337
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#8,965
of 22,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,058
of 317,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#124
of 241 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,229 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,674 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 241 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.