| Title |
Development of the MASCC/ISOO clinical practice guidelines for mucositis: an overview of the methods
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Supportive Care in Cancer, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00520-019-04891-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vinisha Ranna, Karis Kin Fong Cheng, Daniel A. Castillo, Lorraine Porcello, Anusha Vaddi, Rajesh V. Lalla, Paolo Bossi, Sharon Elad |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 20% |
| Denmark | 1 | 10% |
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| Mexico | 1 | 10% |
| Canada | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 63 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 11 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 14% |
| Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Unknown | 19 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 14% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 22 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2019.
All research outputs
#4,776,611
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#1,146
of 4,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,854
of 348,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#31
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,723 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,106 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.