You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
北海道における希少淡水二枚貝カワシンジュガイ属2 種(Margaritifera laevis, Margaritifera togakushiensis)の河川区間での生息の重複
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Japanese Journal of Conservation Ecology, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.18960/hozen.24.1_39 |
| Authors |
三浦 一輝, 石山 信雄, 川尻 啓太, 渥美 圭佑, 長坂 有, 折戸 聖, 町田 善康, 臼井 平, Gao Yiyang, 能瀬 晴菜, 根岸 淳二郎, 中村 太士 |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 1 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2023.
All research outputs
#8,540,769
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Conservation Ecology
#89
of 199 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,007
of 363,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Conservation Ecology
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,724 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.