| Title |
Interoception in anxiety and depression
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Brain Structure and Function, May 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00429-010-0258-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martin P. Paulus, Murray B. Stein |
| Abstract |
We review the literature on interoception as it relates to depression and anxiety, with a focus on belief, and alliesthesia. The connection between increased but noisy afferent interoceptive input, self-referential and belief-based states, and top-down modulation of poorly predictive signals is integrated into a neuroanatomical and processing model for depression and anxiety. The advantage of this conceptualization is the ability to specifically examine the interface between basic interoception, self-referential belief-based states, and enhanced top-down modulation to attenuate poor predictability. We conclude that depression and anxiety are not simply interoceptive disorders but are altered interoceptive states as a consequence of noisily amplified self-referential interoceptive predictive belief states. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 20% |
| Austria | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 962 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 15 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | <1% |
| Italy | 4 | <1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| Uruguay | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | <1% |
| Unknown | 919 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 188 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 142 | 15% |
| Researcher | 124 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 114 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 64 | 7% |
| Other | 153 | 16% |
| Unknown | 177 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 369 | 38% |
| Neuroscience | 144 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 82 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 60 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 1% |
| Other | 80 | 8% |
| Unknown | 213 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 85. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2023.
All research outputs
#499,310
of 25,381,151 outputs
Outputs from Brain Structure and Function
#21
of 1,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,304
of 103,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Structure and Function
#3
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,381,151 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,964 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,715 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.